Case review for Rifas Hussain vs Hussain Abdul Gadir (2019/SC-A/99)
| creativework.keywords | Contract Law | Undue Influence | Case Review | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ahmed, Aminath Rafa | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-10-14T10:39:58Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2024-10-14T10:39:58Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description | INTRODUCTION: This assignment is based on a case review for the Supreme Court case Rifas Hussain vs Hussain Abdul Gadir (2019/SC-A/99), which concluded on September 1, 2021. The case involves two contract elements (consent and legality) as well as Section 15 of Maldivian contract law. Before delving into the Supreme Court case, the basic facts of the case are discussed, followed by the Procedural History of the Magistrate and High Court trials to provide a clear picture of the issues at hand. Following that, the case's issues are established, followed by the Supreme Court trial. The analysis section discusses the relationship between the two parties involved as well as how the contract works while comparing the case to other similar cases dealing with similar issues. Leading up to the ratio decidendi of elements discussed in the case concerning provided pieces of evidence, and concluding the review with the verdict and how the judges arrived at their decision. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hoba.ium.edu.mv/handle/1/3265 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.subject | Contract Law | |
| dc.title | Case review for Rifas Hussain vs Hussain Abdul Gadir (2019/SC-A/99) |